6 Comments
User's avatar
JasonT's avatar

The woman was caught in the act. There was a man involved in the adultry who was not now present. The Law declared it a crime to witness a crime and allow the guilty to go free. Perhaps Jesus pointed out their guilt in this matter.

The Pharisees cared nothing about the woman, their interest was in trapping Jesus. If he sided with the woman, he violated the law of Moses. If he sided with them, he violated the law of Rome which prohibited execution by the Jews.

Expand full comment
Alexander d’Albini's avatar

“ The Law declared it a crime to witness a crime and allow the guilty to go free ”

Have you got a verse for that? I’ve had a look but can’t see it 👍🏽

Expand full comment
Alexander d’Albini's avatar

Is it Lev 5 v 1: “‘If anyone sins because they do not speak up when they hear a public charge to testify regarding something they have seen or learned about, they will be held responsible“?

Expand full comment
JasonT's avatar

Yes. Here as with healing on Sabbath, Jesus is called to chose which law to obey and which to break. He understands his accusers and uses the Law of God to show their hypocrisy.

It is a reading of the story that I had not heard until recently and it fits with Jesus' other dealings with the Jews.

Expand full comment
Alexander d’Albini's avatar

Okay, I have heard this before, but didn’t think this was a good explanation as to why Jesus wrote in the dust.

So in this post, I focussed on and unpacked the dust element of the story.

Were there a deeper narratives John was trying to express?

I think there were. And it linked to God’s judgement on the religious leaders.

Expand full comment
JasonT's avatar

God's concern with corruption committed in His name is always a worthy theme.

Thank you for your writing and dialog.

Expand full comment